Garmin Forerunner 201 Waterproof Running GPS
|
|
Our Price: $299.99 Availability: Usually ships in 1-2 business days Buy Used: from $99.95 (click here) Category: GPS or Navigation System See more product details |
|---|
Why is it so good? It collects everything you need to know to train effectively, pace, speed, distance, time, lap time, altitude, and collects it all for you in a log book as well as in the unit itself. The unit itself holds about 2 years worth of data, and you can sort and view it in variety of ways, on a map, weekly, daily, by lap, etc. On top of the training features you can use the Forerunner 201 for simple navigation tasks. Need to find a trailhead? Just enter the coordinates and press GOTO, and the unit points the way.
Using the Timex GPS you had to write all your data down between each run, and the unit would not do any navigation or mapping. I liked the Timex unit, but the Forerunner 201 is superior in a number of areas. The heartrate monitors don't tell you your speed or distance, so you have to have a separete unit. You can get specialized GPS units, that have base maps, and other specialzed navigation features, but they are not very well suited for running.
The log book is great. It's simple you can view graphs on speed & altitude and basic weekly stats. It even has a little map so you can view your various courses in the log book. If you need a better map you can upload your run to a utility like GPS Vizualizer ( http://www.gpsvisualizer.com/index.html ) and get a nice color map to print out or load on your web page.
The GPS signal will cut off if you get under a thick tree canopy or inside a building, this is a problem with all GPS insturments, they don't work inside. It leaves a little blank spot in your map between where you disappeared and where you reappear, I suppose you could estimate the blank distance if you really wanted too.
The accuracy is pretty good overall. I ran a half marathon and programmed it to beep every mile and it was within feet of every marker, and the end of the race showed 13.08, so I must have cut some corners. You'll probably want to turn on "smoothing" so things don't jump around too much. Obviously, if you maintain a steady speed and direction you get uniform readings. If you start and stop a lot, make lots of 90-degree corners, it jumps around more, and takes a while to smooth your pace out, but it's no big deal.
Buy it you won't regret it.
In large part, I feel like my patience has been rewarded. It takes a while to settle in to Forerunner 201 usage, in the sense that there are a series of custom settings you can control. I've just completed my fifth run with it and I feel like I've finally got the settings where I like them.
One fear I can put to rest: I have very small wrists (6" around) and I was afraid the 201 would be uncomfortable or otherwise unwieldy. Despite a band that is not as supple as you'd find on a real watch, I've never once - despite being a classic fidgeter - re-adjusted the 201 during a run.
The other thing worth noting: you're buying a piece of software as much as hardware. That means you'll want to keep up with new software releases. The model I bought last month shipped with OS 2.1. The current release on the Garmin support site is 3.2. There have been at least four revision levels since my unit was packaged. If you read the list of changes that Garmin provides on its support page (and credit goes here for providing good info), you'll realize that it's very important that you stay up-to-date. Many of the problems you may experience have probably already been encountered by others, reported, corrected and the fix released.
So why four stars instead of five? Chalk it up to my out-of-the-box experience. The documentation frankly is just plain horrible in describing the following reality: these units are assembled and unit-tested in Taiwan. As others on these pages have noted, when you have them delivered to you anyplace 500 miles away from that factory, you have to reset the device in order for it to relocate the GPS satellites. This is *not* intuitive and when I contacted Garmin they sheepishly explained the problem and admitted that they really fumbled it.
This IS NOT a small issue. I was *this close* to either returning the unit or smashing it to a million pieces in frustration then telling my 50 running friends here to stay away at all costs. It amazes me why a very intelligent and capable company like Garmin would jeopardize customer goodwill with an obvious shortcoming that could be easily addressed with a single explanatory paragraph.
I have now used it on a couple of 10M runs and here is my summary:
OVERALL
A very good product, but enough kinks to not get the "great" vote from me. I would certainly recommend this to anyone that is a runner.
PROS
Captures a great deal of data during a run and the history function should be great once the software is available.
Price point is outstanding for what the unit offers
Mapping function is very cool, but not of that much practical use for my needs
Virtual partner is a great feature (allows you to pace against an electronic partner). I see this as a major benefit to individuals who generally train alone.
Auto lap is another good feature that automatically starts another lap after a predetermined point (i.e. 1M). No more remebering to hit the lap button during a race
There is also a custom screen that allows you to track 3 of 15-20 variables (calories, hill grade, elevation, etc)
CONS
The GPS signal had a bit of trouble locking while in my semi-urban neighborhood (lots of 3-5 story buildings) but once I got to more of an open space it worked very well (even maintaining accuracy when I went under a bridge that blocked the signal for 30 yard or so). No leaves on the trees here, so I can't comment on that aspect of coverage, but I could imagine trouble running under a thick tree cover.
The auto pause feature (automatically halts the timing if you drop below a certain pace) sounds cool, but it has way to much lag time (i.e, you stop for 10 seconds at a light, but the unit doesn't kick back in for 25 seconds). I ended up turning this feature off in a hurry.
I think the distance is consistant, and fairly accurate, but potentially a bit short. I ran two loops that had been wheel measured at 3.65M and it read 3.59/3.61. Could be variance in my running tangents, arm swing, etc. At 1% + or -, it is fine for all but the most technical runner.
Another little thing is that the lap pace function seems to do a weighted average rather then current pace. For example, if you run 7:00pace then stop for :30 seconds and start running 7:00 pace again, the readout will be 8:00, and slowly move down the longer you hold the 7:00pace. I guess it is technically accurate, but a bit annoying.
This unit will also be more impressive when they add a HR function.
Just my opinion for what it is worth.